Five ‘Gravity Wells’ in Modern Occultism?   15 comments

Greetings Occult Navigators!

Ok, so there seems to be a bit of a stir going on over a  recent post made on the Strategic Sorcery Blog, where Jason Miller lists five trends in modern occultism that he thinks need to be overcome or otherwise laid to rest.  Rufus Opus had a few thoughts about it on the Head For the Red Blog.  And even Morgan Eckstein links to it and adds a sixth trend that he wants to see die a painful death.

Because this list of five “gravity wells” happens to touch on a couple of subjects near and dear to me, I felt I should weigh in with my own thoughts.  So, let’s begin by taking a look at the five issues:

1) The Holy Guardian Angel as a magickal prerequisite.

2) The Goetia as the be-all and end-all of goetia.

3) Wicca bashing.

4) Quantum Physics as “proof” of magick.

5) System Hubris – or “my system can beat up your system.”

I’ll just run down this list one by one:

1)  The HGA:  Jason’s problem here is not with the concept of the HGA.  It is with a trend he is seeing that seems to make gaining the Knowledge and Conversation of the Holy Guardian Angel some kind of requirement for the practice of magick.

Frater RO takes it in a different direction.  He doesn’t see a trend that requires one to make contact with the HGA so much as a trend toward over-blowing the entire concept of the HGA itself.

To be honest, I have to agree with RO on this one.  I don’t really believe that anyone out there who uses magick without the HGA feels that they are getting no results because of it.  What I do see is people treating the Abramelin Operation as some kind of ultimate initiation into Adepthood – something that can only be attempted by the most advanced and powerful mages, and which will result (if you survive) in the elevation of the individual to a godlike and ascended status.

That is complete bullshit, folks.  If you read the Book of Abramelin itself, you will see that it was written by Abraham the Jew for his son Lamech as an introduction to the practice of magick!  That’s right, it is intended for beginners.  And, Abraham states very clearly in the text that achieving it will not make you an adept.  It is only by working diligently with the HGA over a long period of time that one will eventually achieve adpethood in the practice.

Yet, for all of that, I was recently attacked on my own Solomonic forum at Yahoo because I stated that I commune with my Holy Guardian Angel (nearly) every Sunday morning.  My telling the young lass all of the above didn’t change her tune.  My quoting the Book of Abramelin where Abraham gives the instructions for communing with your Angel every Sabbath didn’t even change her opinion.  She, sadly, was among the many who view Abramelin as a one-off summoning ceremony.  She angrily insisted that contacting the HGA takes six months (or a year and a half) and thus there was no way I could be doing it every Sunday morning.  Besides, if I had contact with my HGA as I claim, then certainly I wouldn’t be tooling around down here with the unascended plebes.

So, yeah, Frater RO is right when he sees the concept of the HGA being overblown.  The HGA is not your Higher Self.  Contacting it does not mean you have attained the Ultimate Magickal Goal and can therefore leave the Earth-plain behind in your own chariot of fire.  And, I should add, merely making contact with the HGA is not the same as gaining “knowledge” of that Angel.

As for Jason’s gripe against viewing the HGA as a magickal prerequisite – I have to admit I am a bit on the fence.  First – hell no, it is not a prerequisite for magick in the larger picture.  However, I do feel that Western magick has long ignored the concept of gaining a Head Spirit to be your primary go-to entity for your magickal practice.  (Much as I think we have ignored ancestor work, magickal offerings and other very ancient aspects of magickal practice for too long.)  I believe we all need to consider these concepts very carefully, and I fully support the trends that are developing to bring them back into our “occulture.”  Where the Santerians have their Saints/Orishas, and various grimoires have their Gatekeeper spirits and even the PMG have their Agathodaemon, I feel that Abramelin provides us with a solid method of establishing one’s Head Spirit rooted firmly in our Western heritage.

But, Jason is right when he says that you shouldn’t think gaining “K&C of the HGA” is the one and only way you’ll ever find success in your magick.  It is ONE way, but not the only way.  Even Abraham said there were only five or six people in the world who have attained the goal.  I would say there are a few more today – but, still, consider that for every ten people you meet who say they’ve done it, one – maybe two – have actually done so.

2) The Goetia:  Jason is right, the Goetia (the book) is fairly overblown today. But, I don’t think I have such a problem with that as Jason does.  He’s sick of hearing about it, and I can dig that.  But it’s a popular book.

Meanwhile, I have to point out that “the Goetia” is not the be-all and end-all of the practice called “goetia.”  Goetia is a vast subject matter.  It is not about the summoning of a list of 72 demons from hell.  It is, in fact, a broad system of magick by which one works with chthonic entities.   (That means Underworld entities – some infernal, some not, some lesser spirits and not a few of them Gods.)  If you work with Demeter and Persephone, or with Angels such as Cassiel, or with Osiris, or use the Orphic Hymns or the Psalmic “lamentations” – you’re working goetia.  Likewise, if you work with Satan, Lucifer, Beelzebub and Belial – you are also working goeita even if you’re not using the book called The Goetia.

If any of the above shocks you in the least, then you need to run out and find yourself a copy of Jake Kent’s Geosophia and his The True Grimoire.  You will come away with a better understanding of the subject of goetia, and with a better understanding of the magick you are already using.  ‘Nuff said.

3) Wicca Bashing:  Ok so Wicca has had its problems.  During the latter half of the 20th Century it was a bit co-opted by the Self-Help movement.  I once had a seeker (back in the 90s) write to me and say that the Wiccan ceremonies he had attended felt more like a support group meeting than an actual magickal ritual.  And, I fear I had to agree with him.

Plus, Wicca was also co-opted by the mass media.  From Llewellyn’s endless publication of fluff material, to Buffy and Charmed, to movies like Practical Magic (Sandra Bullock – yummy!) and The Craft, Wicca did seem to have had its soul sucked out by modern commercialism.

However, I can’t entirely knock the fact that Wicca went mainstream.  When I first started on my path, I was a Wiccan.  And even then (early 90s) it was still dangerous to be a witch.  You could lose your job, your home and even your children.  You could be physically attacked.  But after the movement’s heyday in the last decade of the 20th Century – that is after Buffy, after The Craft, after Harry Potter – being a witch finally became “ok.”  Maybe you were weird, but you were no longer “a dangerous cultist who doubtlessly abused children and small animals.”  This applied not only to Wiccans, but to witches of various types.  That was a Good Thing.

But we were still left with the overall impression that Wicca was for fluffy-bunnies, self-help New Agers and overweight teenage girls looking to shock their parents.  (I have no clue why “overweight” got tossed in there – have you seen some of the skinny girls running around half-naked at Pagan festivals??  But I digress…)

For my part, I have always felt that this was an unfair characterization of Wicca.  Just take the time to read through the Farrars’ Witches Bible, and you will find a deep and fully-formed Tradition of spirituality.  Read through Drawing Down the Moon by Margot Adler and you will discover that Wicca and Neopagansim – as a movement – has a fascinating and diverse history.  And, personally, I think you should also read Future Shock and The Third Wave by Alvin Toffler while you’re at it.  He doesn’t mention Wicca or Neopaganism, but he describes fundamental changes taking place in our culture for which Neopagansim is quite well suited.  (Look for the term “demassification” and think about how it applies to religion, and how Neopaganism fits the bill as a demassified religion.)

For my part, I once wrote an essay called The Neogan Altar – Shamanic Paradigm – wherein I presented the standard Neopagan usage of the Altar from the standpoint of ancient shamanism.  My goal was to point out that Wicca, in many ways, fit the bill as a form of modern shamanism – having arisen quite naturally in our modern Western culture.  I had intended to follow this essay with other “Shamanic Paradigm” essays illustrating further aspects of Wicca and Neopaganism in this light.  Alas, my writing career took me in other directions – but perhaps I will someday return to the subject and complete the series.

All in all, I am quite proud to have begun my magickal career as a Wiccan – no matter how far I have since delved into the grimoires and the Golden Dawn.  So, yeah, I agree the Wiccan bashing has run its course and – in many ways – is entirely based on ignorance.  (See #5 in this list.)

4) Quantum Physics:  I agree with Jason and Frater RO.  For a very long time people have been conflating magick with the theories of Quantum Physics.  Not only are they not saying the same things at all, but those who make the connection most often do not understand the first thing about QP.  It is simply that when QP is dumbed down for presentation to us non-physicists, it can sound an awful lot like magick.  I refer you to the famous Arthur C. Clark quote about advanced science often appearing like magick…

Yet, I will also play a bit of devil’s advocate here.  While I do not feel QP and magick are one and the same, nor do I feel that QP helps explain or prove anything about magick, I still find the subject matter a worthwhile one for practitioners of magick.  Much in the same way I feel that psychology and NLP are useful studies for magiciains.  It is not that they are the same thing at all, but I feel that the modern scientific studies can inform our views of magick.   (Plus, I tend to see science as a kind of magick  or mysticism in its own right.)

Understanding that everything in the universe is formed from different vibrations of energy is useful when you’re contemplating magick.  Understanding that there are various dimensions – only one of which we can easily perceive with our five senses – is useful, too.  Understanding Chaos Theory (systems, feedback and iteration) is very very useful in the study of magick.  Even String Theory, Schrodinger’s Cat and the postulation of parallel universes – all of these examples and many more are good things to think about when you’re studying magick.

It remains true, though, that you should consider them as separate studies than the art and science of magick.  They are not “the same thing” at all.

And finally:

5) System Hubris:  I don’t have too much to say on this one.  It seems to be something humans have always done, and will always do.  In the classical era, the city-dwelling Theurgists swore their magick was “better” than what the Goen practiced in the rural areas.  The Christians, Jews and Muslims swore (and still swear) their religions are “better” than the Pagan ones.  Ceremonial magicians swear their systems are “better” than Wicca and Neopaganism.  Solomonic magicians swear their chosen grimories are “better” than the grimoires used by other Solomonic magicians.  The list could just go on and on and on ad nauseum.

And it is all part of the same chain of childish bullshit.  The phrase “There is nothing new under the Sun” was written a few thousand years ago – and it is as true today as it was back then.  Your system isn’t any better than all the rest – it just happens to be better for YOU.  What you found works best for you is what we refer to as a Calling.

If the African Orishas called you, then Santeria is going to work better for you than anything else.  If the Angels and spirits of the grimoires called you, then Solomonic magick is going to kick ass over all the rest.  If the Angels of the Tree of Life called you, then the Qabalah is your thing.  If the Lord and Lady called you, then I guess you’re stuck with Wicca.  Every magician, every witch, every shaman, every man or woman of God/Gods/Goddess/etc. of any brand whatsoever was called to their post by their own spiritual guides and guardians.

This is simply something over which you do not have free will.  You’re either called, or you’re not.  If you’re not called to a path, then that path isn’t going to lead you anywhere.   If you are called to a path, then you’re either going to go that way (even if it’s kicking and screaming) or you might as well lay down your wand and give up your quest.

Sure, you can be called by more than one system.  I was called to Wicca. (One of my earliest spiritual experiences was of the Goddess walking beside me in a dream, whispering in my ear, “Blessed are thy feet that have brought thee in the way.  Blessed are thy knees that shall kneel at the sacred altar.  Blessed…” well you get the idea.)  Then I was called to the Qabalah and Golden Dawn work.  Then the Grimoires called out to me.  Even the Gods of Santeria and Voodoo called out to me – not to come join them, but that they had something they wanted to teach me.  But, regardless of when or how I was called, I was called to each and every path I’ve walked.  And so have you been.

Zorge

Aaron

Posted June 18, 2012 by kheph777 in blogs, history, religion, students, wicca

Tagged with , ,

15 responses to “Five ‘Gravity Wells’ in Modern Occultism?

Subscribe to comments with RSS.

  1. Most of the rubbish spouted about Holy Guardian angels misses what Mr Abramelin believed it was. It was not until I was talking to a Bulgarian Orthodox priest that I realised how wrong the “higher self” view was. The Bulgarian Orthodox Church was not reformed so contains a lot of the old ideas which were common in the middle ages. In the Middle Ages it was believed that when you were born you were assigned a guardian angel and a guardian devil. The devil was your personal tempter and your angel was supposed to help and protect you. The priest told me that you were not supposed to piss off your Holy Guardian Angel or it would be less co-operative. This is the sort of being that you were supposed to contact in the Abramelin working. It was supposed to get you control of your inner demons so you could do other work. It was not a higher self, and since everyone had a HGA then talking to it was probably not that significant. It was like chatting to your supervisor at work so you did not have to bother the manager. I don’t think it is compulsory, but I suspect most impulses that beginners have of a spiritual nature come from this being. Less is written about the holy guardian demon and the priest did not mention him other than to say you should never listen to him.

    • I see you and I have both learned much from contact with Orthodox sources. :) My understanding of the Grimoires increased as much from my contact with Eastern Orthodox Christianity as it did from contact with Santeria and Voodoo.

      In the “Guardian Angel Camp”, we normally call the two brings you describe the Angel and Demon of the Nativity. There are methods of using your birth chart to find their names – which I have in fact posted on this very blog. (Search for the entry with “Tables of Ziruph” in the title.) The Holy Guardian Angel of Abramelin, though, is considered a higher being that transcends the natal chart. I see it as more of a Gnostic being. The Logos and Sophia mate, and their Child is the Spiritus Sanctus. The HGA is a direct representative – an embodiment even – of the Holy Spirit.

      Agrippa speaks of both of these Guardian Angels (along with a third “Angel of the Profession”) when he talks about the “threefold keeper of man.”

  2. Pingback: Five ‘Gravity Wells’ in Modern Occultism? – by Aaron Leitch | blausternschlonge

  3. We should remember that the Vision of the HGA is the spiritual experience not of Tiphereth, but of Malkuth. Even 777 says so! If more people understood this the world would be a happier place.

  4. Love it Aaron, love it.

    Really We should get you back on the show!!!

  5. Good post Aaron and good points. Haven’t read Jason’s blog or ROs replies yet but could have guessed at everyones ‘stance’ anyway. ;-)

  6. Thanks for your defense of Quantum Theory. I don’t think magick and physics are the same thing, but I do think that Quantum Theory has some things to say about living in a participatory Universe, and it’s just plain enjoyable to study.

    BTW, your quote about magic and technology is actually one of Arthur C. Clarke’s “Three Laws”.

  7. Hi. I really agree with the points here, especially those regarding quantum theory and magic. In fact that is something which I looked at in depth some time ago on my blog (pasting here with permission from Aaron) – http://liminalwhispers.blogspot.co.uk/2011/10/solve-et-coagula.html

    Thanks

    Paolo

    • Thanks Paolo! I’m surprised just how many people have spoken up – on several blogs – about this Quantum Physics thing. Looks like it was just “time” to speak out on that point.

  8. Definitely. I felt like I was hitting a wall with this and a lot of people wouldnt accept that there may not be a connection between QP and physics. I hope that the time has now come that we are moving away from the idea. Part of the problem is that in bining ourselves to a scientific paradigm we are also limiting ourselves.

  9. I guess I am just another person saying “thank you” for standing up for Quantum physics. I’ve often been taken to task for saying that I will, immediately, ignore any pagan author or individual who attempts to make the claim that Quantum physics “proves” the existence of magic. As someone who is religious, but a hard core science lover, it irks me to no end how quickly some are to grasp onto the research and hard work of our scientific community for the purpose of misleading others or getting a book deal.

    A word about bashing Wiccans. I, like you, started out on the path of Wicca during the 90’s Wicca boom. Now, having moved onto Ceremonial work and Hellenic religious practices, I don’t “bash Wiccans” for the commercialization of their religion. I “bash them” because they often place themselves as the de-facto authorities on everything pagan. You have no idea how annoying it is to go to “pagan” groups and meet-ups only to find that it’s an Eclectic Wiccan meet up that expects you to mold to their ritual, and religious, structure because “It’s all the same right?”

    It’s not that I think Wiccan religion and magical practice are, in any way, inferior to my own; I just don’t like the glossing over of the fact that my religion and that of other pagans might actually be different and we all don’t celebrate the Wheel of the Year and think all gods are one god, etc. I also disdain the way the, vocal, Wiccan majority has taken it upon itself to attempt to dictate the political, social, and economic mandates by which all pagans must live. I am no conservative by any stretch of the imagination (except maybe fiscally) but I can’t help but notice the overwhelming liberal brow beating that happens in the pagan community overall, and this often comes from persnickety, holier-than-thou, sanctimonious Wiccans who feel their “limerick morality” is the end all be all of philosophy.

    Yes, I did make sweeping generalizations, but it’s something many other pagans have noticed and continue to speak up about despite being vilified for not singing “kumbaya” and making nice with the other kids. If we are to continue to thrive and grow as a community, we will have to acknowledge the differences between us and actually address them; that includes issues of religion, race, socio-economic privilege, etc. Otherwise; we’re just a bunch of jack offs thinking we’re preaching to the choir, when we’re really just pissing in the wind.

  10. Pingback: Abramelin – Be Afraid!? « Ananael

  11. Great post.
    I would also add one more occultists trap: Kabbalah, Qabalah …

    It seems that if you do not “pathwork into the tree” you will lost your soul for all eternity. If you don`t relate everything to some zephirot it has no value and you`ll have not connection with (the) divinity (oh thou unholy man, thou deserve the abyss).
    And so on.

    Quoting one of your previous phrases about some other gravity hole:
    “Its a good thing just not a necessary thing”, specially not for people out of the monotheistic reach.

    Greetings!

Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out / Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out / Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out / Change )

Google+ photo

You are commenting using your Google+ account. Log Out / Change )

Connecting to %s

Follow

Get every new post delivered to your Inbox.

Join 3,031 other followers

%d bloggers like this: